I over-all liked the movie It Follows. I thought it was creative, and I thought that it was probably a very fun movie to make. I think it has a sort of unique kind of scariness, because you will always get these scenes where you can see someone walking up in the background and have often no idea whether it’s the monster or not. Very tense. I did come out of it having a lot of questions though, and although it’s probably unreasonable to want the movie to answer all of them, I do think it could have done a better job explaining it than it did. For example can it turn into any animal? Or just humans? A lot of the things it turns into are at least not entirely human, so there must be some issues there. Also, why did they not immediately realize that the best solution is just to have two people who could see the monster, and two people who couldn’t. What is their idea of sex? Could someone give It to someone else through gay sex? Who knows. One other way I felt is that they had sex scenes i
So, I haven’t yet seen the original Invisible Man, so this is about the remake that was just made with Elizabeth Moss. My first impression was a lot like a lot of other Blumhouse movies, where it starts off great and gets less and less scary as it goes on. This isn’t like a complaint or anything, but I did notice that you discovered that she definitely wasn't crazy early on. Hence: Invisible Man 2.0 It had been one month since Cecilia’s admitance to the phyciatric hospital, and suicide. Things had mostly gone smoothly for her sister, Emily. Well, as smooth as things can go after your sister tries to kill you, and then kills herself. Emily understood, at least. Her sister had come out of an abusive relationship, and had gone crazy. Spouting bullshit about Adrien still being alive. Emily probably would’ve done the same if she constantly thought she was in mortal danger and nobody believed her. But there was one thing Emily didn’t understand. If Em had gone crazy and thought her abu